Benchmark avg
41.6
6 tracked scores
ActiveModel portfolio
Tap a star to rate
Anthropic · Closed · Context 200K tokens
Cadle Score
142.3
#116 in index
Benchmark average
—
Not enough benchmark results yet
Pricing
Unlisted
no list price
MODEL MATRIX · TRUTH CENTER CELLS
Overall
—
Intelligence
—
Coding
—
Reasoning
35.7
Language
83.6
Knowledge
—
Agentic
—
MMLU
—
GPQA
71.2
Math
—
LiveCodeBench
—
HumanEval
—
Reason
—
ARC-AGI
22.2
Coverage AVG
46.2
Cadle Cap ranks models with within-benchmark percentiles so ARC-AGI ~40 and MMLU ~90 never compete raw. Coverage AVG is an importance-weighted mean of filled expert cells only — blanks are skipped, not zeroed.
ANALYSIS · TRUTH CENTER
Hard benches (GPQA · ARC-AGI · LCB · Agentic) sit left — a mid-40 on ARC-AGI can still be frontier. Broader benches on the right are easier and often higher.
Only measured signals
Benchmark avg
41.6
6 tracked scores
Strongest signal
lech-mazur-writing
Score 83.6
Blended $/1M
Unlisted
No published list price
Context
200K
Provider context window (not max output)
Measured matrix and verified gateway observations only.
PROVIDER
Anthropic
CONTEXT
200K tokens
STATUS
ACTIVE
Real operator evaluations, prompt robustness observations, and deployment notes for claude-opus-4-20250514_16K.
Tested claude-opus-4-20250514_16K on high-concurrency tool loops. Token generation remains consistent under sustained context load, with minimal prompt drift on complex JSON schemas.
Evaluated claude-opus-4-20250514_16K on multi-turn code synthesis. Code reasoning and diff application succeed on ~88% of test suites. Best paired with strict system prompt guardrails.
| Metric | |
|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic |
| Release | |
| Input / 1M | No data yet |
| Output / 1M | No data yet |
| Context | 200K tokens |
| Cadle Cap | 142 |
| Cap board | Cadle Language Cap 142 |
| arc-agi-2 | 8.6 |
| arc-agi | 35.7 |
| vpct | 7.0 |
| lech-mazur-writing | 83.6 |
| weirdml | 43.7 |
| gpqa-diamond | 71.2 |
Scores may use different scales — check the Benchmarks tab for source links.
Same Truth Center numbers as the datasheet above. Accuracy, reliability, safety, and cost scores are not invented.
Source: Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0) · LMArena (CC BY 4.0) · as of 2026-11-03 · All credits